Triple
T38295625
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Natural Resources Transfer Agreements |
E1022478
|
entity |
| Predicate | cameIntoForceInProvince |
P67338
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alberta in 1930 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alberta in 1930 | Statement: [Natural Resources Transfer Agreements, cameIntoForceInProvince, Alberta in 1930]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cameIntoForceInProvince Context triple: [Natural Resources Transfer Agreements, cameIntoForceInProvince, Alberta in 1930]
-
A.
cameIntoForceInCountry
Indicates that a law, regulation, or agreement became legally effective within a specified country.
-
B.
cameIntoForceBefore
Indicates that one legal instrument, rule, or agreement became legally effective earlier in time than another.
-
C.
enteredIntoForceBy
Indicates that a legal instrument, agreement, or provision became legally effective as a result of an action taken by a specified authority, event, or instrument.
-
D.
joinedAsProvince
Indicates that an entity became part of a larger political or administrative unit with the status of a province.
-
E.
enteredIntoForceIn
chosen
Indicates that an agreement, law, or treaty became legally effective or operative in a specified place or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df190f081908d5aa02c8a9286d0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fccbd826708190b5fab12c4236299a |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcc58838e08190b8fa54aa5c165f2d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.