Triple
T38286894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Emma Tennant |
E1022238
|
entity |
| Predicate | reimaginedWorkOf |
P78725
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde | Statement: [Emma Tennant, reimaginedWorkOf, Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reimaginedWorkOf Context triple: [Emma Tennant, reimaginedWorkOf, Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde]
-
A.
adaptedWorkOf
Indicates that one work is derived from, based on, or reinterprets the content of another pre-existing work.
-
B.
partOfReimaginingOf
Indicates that something is a component or segment within a larger work that is itself a reimagined version of an earlier work.
-
C.
isModernReimaginingOf
Indicates that one work is a contemporary reinterpretation or updated version of another earlier work.
-
D.
adaptedWorkOfAuthor
Indicates that a work is an adaptation derived from, based on, or reinterpreting the original work of a specified author.
-
E.
reimagines
chosen
Indicates that one entity creatively reconceives, interprets, or presents another in a significantly new or different way.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df190f081908d5aa02c8a9286d0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcd867f36081908c88c55a6a1404c1 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd1f47b188190b4cf4b4c748d9d03 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:55 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.