Triple

T38277814
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Hanging Odes E1022006 entity
Predicate alternativeCountTradition P46023 FINISHED
Object 10 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 10 | Statement: [The Hanging Odes, alternativeCountTradition, 10]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternativeCountTradition
Context triple: [The Hanging Odes, alternativeCountTradition, 10]
  • A. variantTraditions chosen
    Indicates that there exist differing or alternative traditions or customary practices associated with the same subject or context.
  • B. mainTradition
    Indicates that one entity represents the primary or dominant tradition associated with another entity.
  • C. usesTradition
    Indicates that one entity employs or draws upon a tradition as a guiding method, resource, or influence in its actions or practices.
  • D. comparesTradition
    Indicates a relationship where one entity evaluates or contrasts a tradition with another tradition or standard.
  • E. establishedTradition
    Indicates that something has become a customary, long-standing practice or convention that is regularly followed within a group, culture, or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76df0cddc81908d16c1556ff4097f completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fccbd826708190b5fab12c4236299a completed May 7, 2026, 5:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcc58838e08190b8fa54aa5c165f2d completed May 7, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.