Triple
T38260733
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brenier map |
E1017920
|
entity |
| Predicate | isGuaranteedBy |
P190217
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brenier’s polar factorization theorem |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brenier’s polar factorization theorem | Statement: [Brenier map, isGuaranteedBy, Brenier’s polar factorization theorem]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isGuaranteedBy Context triple: [Brenier map, isGuaranteedBy, Brenier’s polar factorization theorem]
-
A.
guaranteedFor
Indicates that one entity provides an assurance or warranty that remains valid for another entity over a specified period or under certain conditions.
-
B.
aimsToGuarantee
Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to ensure that a particular condition, outcome, or state is reliably achieved or maintained for another.
-
C.
guaranteeStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a guarantee associated with an entity or agreement.
-
D.
guaranteeProvider
Indicates that one entity serves as the party that provides or issues a guarantee for another entity or obligation.
-
E.
mayGuarantee
Indicates that one entity has the potential or authority to provide a guarantee for another entity or outcome.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76de33e4481909099fa812709bd42 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcc3321ef081908023590ba70ba0cf |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcb0fdc6e08190b05e894c59481a0d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcc330b4288190858b49d986160706 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.