Triple

T38234545
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bertha of Burgundy E1013583 entity
Predicate canonLawConflict P190585 FINISHED
Object consanguinity with Robert II of France LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consanguinity with Robert II of France | Statement: [Bertha of Burgundy, canonLawConflict, consanguinity with Robert II of France]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canonLawConflict
Context triple: [Bertha of Burgundy, canonLawConflict, consanguinity with Robert II of France]
  • A. canonLawContext
    Indicates that something occurs within, is governed by, or is interpreted according to the norms and framework of canon law.
  • B. canonLawSubject
    Indicates that an entity is the subject or topic governed, regulated, or addressed by a particular canon law or set of canonical legal norms.
  • C. canonLawAction
    Indicates an action, decision, or procedure carried out under or in accordance with canon law.
  • D. canonLawContribution
    Indicates a contribution an entity makes to the development, interpretation, or application of canon law.
  • E. canonLawTraining
    Indicates that one entity has provided or received training or education in canon law in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd72a248190a5fe18db2bd1eb15 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fccbd826708190b5fab12c4236299a completed May 7, 2026, 5:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcc58838e08190b8fa54aa5c165f2d completed May 7, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fccbd6b7688190b746803cf78d5704 completed May 7, 2026, 5:28 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.