Triple

T3822026
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject October Term 2012 E88593 entity
Predicate includesCase P1393 FINISHED
Object Arizona v. United States (post-remand proceedings) E4583 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arizona v. United States (post-remand proceedings) | Statement: [October Term 2012, includesCase, Arizona v. United States (post-remand proceedings)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Arizona v. United States (post-remand proceedings)
Context triple: [October Term 2012, includesCase, Arizona v. United States (post-remand proceedings)]
  • A. Arizona v. United States chosen
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • B. California v. Texas
    California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
  • C. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • D. Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system
    The Arizona judicial conduct and discipline system is the framework of bodies and procedures responsible for investigating, evaluating, and, when necessary, sanctioning judges in Arizona to uphold judicial ethics and public confidence in the courts.
  • E. Alabama v. Texas
    Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed9538cf881909d9ce8ca4ac7c18c completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeea62cdfc81909a3bf458b73d60e7 completed March 9, 2026, 3:42 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b4fb4c70008190bb8712f46f40d6f8 completed March 14, 2026, 6:08 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.