Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant | Statement: [October Term 2012, includesCase, American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant]

Target entity: American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Context triple: [October Term 2012, includesCase, American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant]

• A. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
  Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.
• B. McDonald v. Smith
  McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
• C. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
  Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
• D. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
  California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the limits of First Amendment petitioning rights when parties allegedly use governmental and judicial processes as part of an anticompetitive scheme in violation of antitrust laws.
• E. Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
  Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Triple: [October Term 2012, includesCase, American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant]

American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of arbitration agreements containing class-action waivers, even when the cost of individual arbitration exceeds potential recovery.

Target entity: American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Target entity description: American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of arbitration agreements containing class-action waivers, even when the cost of individual arbitration exceeds potential recovery.

• A. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
  Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.
• B. McDonald v. Smith
  McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
• C. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
  Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
• D. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
  California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the limits of First Amendment petitioning rights when parties allegedly use governmental and judicial processes as part of an anticompetitive scheme in violation of antitrust laws.
• E. Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
  Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
• F. None of above. chosen