Triple

T3821869
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frontiero v. Richardson E88590 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Sharron A. Frontiero et al. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al. E88590 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sharron A. Frontiero et al. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al. | Statement: [Frontiero v. Richardson, fullCaseName, Sharron A. Frontiero et al. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Sharron A. Frontiero et al. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Context triple: [Frontiero v. Richardson, fullCaseName, Sharron A. Frontiero et al. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Defense, et al.]
  • A. Frontiero v. Richardson chosen
    Frontiero v. Richardson is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that advanced gender equality by striking down federal benefit rules that discriminated against female military service members.
  • B. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • C. Corrigan v. Buckley
    Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
  • D. Rostker v. Goldberg
    Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
  • E. Nixon v. Fitzgerald
    Nixon v. Fitzgerald is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that established absolute immunity from civil damages liability for a President’s official acts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed9538cf881909d9ce8ca4ac7c18c completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeea62cdfc81909a3bf458b73d60e7 completed March 9, 2026, 3:42 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b4fb4998248190b4174dd80a8e790c completed March 14, 2026, 6:08 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.