Triple
T38217188
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Diamond Lens |
E1010717
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMotiveForInvention |
P201007
|
FINISHED |
| Object | desire to see deeper into nature |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: desire to see deeper into nature | Statement: [The Diamond Lens, hasMotiveForInvention, desire to see deeper into nature]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMotiveForInvention Context triple: [The Diamond Lens, hasMotiveForInvention, desire to see deeper into nature]
-
A.
hasInventionProperty
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, attribute, or quality related to an invention.
-
B.
usedInventionOf
Indicates that one entity made use of, applied, or implemented the invention created by another entity.
-
C.
invention
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of another entity, typically a device, method, or idea.
-
D.
hasKeyInvention
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or crucial invention.
-
E.
basedOnInventionOf
Indicates that something is derived from, developed using, or fundamentally relies on a particular invention.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dcdc7708190a5f1751d53f40ffe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffc083a54c8190ac80d05ee8d20a6b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffbfeb05b88190b4d50ce8124004d9 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:14 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ffc082a4e881908a92313d2c755afe |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.