Triple
T38205154
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gulf (proposed macro-family) |
E1009176
|
entity |
| Predicate | evaluationByLinguists |
P167182
|
FINISHED |
| Object | insufficiently demonstrated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: insufficiently demonstrated | Statement: [Gulf (proposed macro-family), evaluationByLinguists, insufficiently demonstrated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evaluationByLinguists Context triple: [Gulf (proposed macro-family), evaluationByLinguists, insufficiently demonstrated]
-
A.
areConsideredByOtherLinguists
Indicates that certain items, concepts, or analyses are regarded or evaluated in a particular way by linguists other than the primary or referenced one.
-
B.
linguisticStudies
Indicates that an entity engages in or is associated with the academic study or analysis of language and its structure.
-
C.
hasLinguist
Indicates that an entity is associated with or possesses a linguist, typically as a member, employee, collaborator, or resource.
-
D.
evaluatedByModernScholarsAs
chosen
Indicates that something has been judged or characterized in a particular way by contemporary academic or scholarly experts.
-
E.
linguisticClassificationDebatedBy
Indicates that the linguistic classification of something is a subject of disagreement or debate among specified parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc94fcc8190bd2f55e81f9d6527 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcc42cbac48190b8d3e4c9ce140838 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcb0fc69c88190800453eb57a7e62c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.