Triple

T38195521
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Duwamish community in Seattle E1005598 entity
Predicate hasSymbolicRelationshipWith P105506 FINISHED
Object City of Seattle government NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Seattle government | Statement: [Duwamish community in Seattle, hasSymbolicRelationshipWith, City of Seattle government]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSymbolicRelationshipWith
Context triple: [Duwamish community in Seattle, hasSymbolicRelationshipWith, City of Seattle government]
  • A. hasSymbolicRelationshipType
    Indicates that there exists a symbolic (non-literal) relationship of a specified type between two entities.
  • B. symbolicRelation chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity stands for, represents, or conveys meaning about another through symbols or abstract signs.
  • C. hasContrastingRelationshipWith
    Indicates a relationship in which two entities are opposed, divergent, or markedly different in qualities, roles, or effects.
  • D. haveRelationshipWith
    Indicates that one entity is in some form of defined relationship or association with another entity.
  • E. allyRelation
    Indicates a cooperative, supportive relationship in which the entities act as allies toward shared or aligned goals.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dbd22f48190940318cea061e8bb completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fccbd826708190b5fab12c4236299a completed May 7, 2026, 5:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcc58838e08190b8fa54aa5c165f2d completed May 7, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:29 p.m.