Triple
T38167098
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bay Mills Indian Community Police Department |
E953175
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPoliceType |
P201600
|
FINISHED |
| Object | tribal police |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tribal police | Statement: [Bay Mills Indian Community Police Department, hasPoliceType, tribal police]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPoliceType Context triple: [Bay Mills Indian Community Police Department, hasPoliceType, tribal police]
-
A.
hasPoliceRole
Indicates that an entity holds or performs a specific role, duty, or function within a police or law enforcement context.
-
B.
hasPolicePartner
Indicates that one entity has another entity as its partner in a police or law-enforcement context.
-
C.
hasPoliceAI
Indicates that an entity is equipped with, governed by, or utilizes an artificial intelligence system specifically for policing or law-enforcement functions.
-
D.
hasPolicePowersIn
Indicates that an entity possesses official police authority or jurisdiction within a specified area or region.
-
E.
hasPoliceTheme
Indicates that something features police, law enforcement, or policing activities as a central theme or focus.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f0b93c48190a117319ab3a9f282 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a000a1d8fa88190a1d82ac746565c48 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0008b26eb88190ae03b2309a614774 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:25 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a000a1c8f8881908293ab4f7207d25f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:31 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.