Triple

T38160416
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zapfino Arabic E953000 entity
Predicate hasExtendedCharacterSet P194592 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Zapfino Arabic, hasExtendedCharacterSet, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExtendedCharacterSet
Context triple: [Zapfino Arabic, hasExtendedCharacterSet, yes]
  • A. hasUnicode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, represented by, or encoded using a specific Unicode character or sequence.
  • B. hasUnicodeStandard
    Indicates that something conforms to, is defined by, or is associated with a particular version or aspect of the Unicode standard.
  • C. hasUnicodeVariant
    Indicates that one entity has an alternative representation or equivalent form in Unicode corresponding to the other entity.
  • D. hasUnicodeStatus
    Indicates that a given entity has a particular Unicode-related classification or status (such as assigned, reserved, deprecated, or noncharacter) within the Unicode standard.
  • E. hasLocalCharacter
    Indicates that something possesses qualities, features, or significance that are specific to a particular locality or region.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f0b93c48190a117319ab3a9f282 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd7b0503a08190ba07338365b6fcc9 completed May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd7a9733dc81909199f453c0cc2bc1 completed May 8, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd7b042a548190b3abe31bc3258278 completed May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.