Triple

T38160401
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zapfino Arabic E953000 entity
Predicate usesOpenTypeFeatures P190168 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Zapfino Arabic, usesOpenTypeFeatures, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesOpenTypeFeatures
Context triple: [Zapfino Arabic, usesOpenTypeFeatures, yes]
  • A. hasLigatures
    Indicates that one writing system, font, or text includes combined character forms (ligatures) that join two or more individual glyphs into a single symbol.
  • B. hasCalligraphy
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with calligraphy, such as having calligraphic writing, decoration, or stylistic features.
  • C. hasCalligraphyLanguage
    Indicates that an entity’s calligraphy is written in, or associated with, a particular language.
  • D. typicalFontSupport
    Indicates that one entity (such as a system, application, or platform) normally includes or provides support for a particular font or set of fonts under standard conditions.
  • E. hasUnicodeVariant
    Indicates that one entity has an alternative representation or equivalent form in Unicode corresponding to the other entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f0b93c48190a117319ab3a9f282 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcb089a8f881909aa9e722babd43f7 completed May 7, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fc45666c5c8190913bd632ac0e5b84 completed May 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcb088aac481909db90804faff315f completed May 7, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.