Triple
T38143666
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sometimes… |
E952549
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasParentWorkCreator |
P193940
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tyler, The Creator |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tyler, The Creator | Statement: [Sometimes…, hasParentWorkCreator, Tyler, The Creator]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasParentWorkCreator Context triple: [Sometimes…, hasParentWorkCreator, Tyler, The Creator]
-
A.
hasParentWork
Indicates that one work is derived from, contained within, or otherwise subordinate to another, more primary work.
-
B.
hasWorkCreator
Indicates that an entity is the creator or originator of a particular work (such as a document, artwork, or other creative product).
-
C.
hasParentWorkComposer
chosen
Indicates that a work is related to the composer of its parent (containing or overarching) work.
-
D.
hasParentWorkKey
Indicates that an entity is associated with the identifier (key) of the parent work from which it is derived or of which it is a part.
-
E.
hasCreatorFamilyRelation
Indicates that an entity’s creator is related by family (e.g., parent, sibling, spouse, or other kinship) to another specified person.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f09a7148190a4b91c0bacdc127a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0075be7f54819081ab12bc1dab53bb |
completed | May 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0073a19030819098c23faa3adcb96e |
completed | May 10, 2026, 12:01 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.