Triple
T38137676
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Allen v. Milligan |
E952394
|
entity |
| Predicate | reaffirmedPrecedent |
P190137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Thornburg v. Gingles |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thornburg v. Gingles | Statement: [Allen v. Milligan, reaffirmedPrecedent, Thornburg v. Gingles]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reaffirmedPrecedent Context triple: [Allen v. Milligan, reaffirmedPrecedent, Thornburg v. Gingles]
-
A.
claimedPrecedent
Indicates that one party asserts a prior case, decision, or example as a guiding or authoritative basis for the current situation or argument.
-
B.
modifiedPrecedent
Indicates that one entity has altered, qualified, or changed the terms, scope, or interpretation of a prior decision, rule, or precedent.
-
C.
typicalPrecedent
Indicates that one situation, case, or event serves as a standard or commonly followed example for how similar later situations are handled.
-
D.
subsequentCitationAsPrecedentFor
Indicates that one citation is used later as a precedent or authoritative basis for another citation or legal decision.
-
E.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f09a7148190a4b91c0bacdc127a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcb089a8f881909aa9e722babd43f7 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fc45666c5c8190913bd632ac0e5b84 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcb088aac481909db90804faff315f |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.