Triple

T38130294
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clovis II E952199 entity
Predicate predecessorInNeustria P197284 FINISHED
Object Dagobert I NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dagobert I | Statement: [Clovis II, predecessorInNeustria, Dagobert I]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: predecessorInNeustria
Context triple: [Clovis II, predecessorInNeustria, Dagobert I]
  • A. predecessorAsKingOfWestFrancia
    Indicates that one entity served as the immediately preceding king of West Francia relative to another entity.
  • B. predecessorAsDukeOfTheFranks
    Indicates that one individual previously held the title of Duke of the Franks before another, establishing a direct succession relationship between them.
  • C. predecessorAsKingOfAustrasia
    Indicates that one entity previously held the position of king of Austrasia immediately before another entity.
  • D. predecessorAsKingOfEastFrancia
    Indicates that one person previously held the position of King of East Francia immediately before another person.
  • E. predecessorAsDukeOfBrittany
    Indicates that one entity previously held the title of Duke of Brittany immediately before another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f083548819082bd2bbf53c79e8e completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe831c97c88190b27ecf100e25c2a0 completed May 9, 2026, 12:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe7f1b92648190b14e56bcaee5d0ca completed May 9, 2026, 12:26 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe831ba4708190a5564afd7d5a4319 completed May 9, 2026, 12:43 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.