Triple
T38128296
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John III of Penthièvre |
E952144
|
entity |
| Predicate | heldClaimsThrough |
P73422
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hereditary rights from Joan of Penthièvre |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hereditary rights from Joan of Penthièvre | Statement: [John III of Penthièvre, heldClaimsThrough, hereditary rights from Joan of Penthièvre]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heldClaimsThrough Context triple: [John III of Penthièvre, heldClaimsThrough, hereditary rights from Joan of Penthièvre]
-
A.
hasClaimOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds a right, entitlement, or demand over another entity or its resources.
-
B.
holdsTo
Indicates that one entity maintains, adheres, or remains committed to another entity, such as a belief, standard, agreement, or condition.
-
C.
holdsIn
Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
-
D.
heldAs
Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
-
E.
recognizedClaimsOver
Indicates that one party has formally acknowledged or accepted the validity of certain claims made by another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f083548819082bd2bbf53c79e8e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcb089a8f881909aa9e722babd43f7 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fc45666c5c8190913bd632ac0e5b84 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.