Triple

T38114476
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject J’adore Absolu E951752 entity
Predicate bottleDesignTheme P61406 FINISHED
Object similar to J’adore LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: similar to J’adore | Statement: [J’adore Absolu, bottleDesignTheme, similar to J’adore]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bottleDesignTheme
Context triple: [J’adore Absolu, bottleDesignTheme, similar to J’adore]
  • A. bottleDecorationDesigner
    Indicates that an entity is the designer responsible for creating the decorative elements or visual design applied to a bottle.
  • B. bottleFeature
    Indicates that a bottle possesses or is characterized by a particular feature or attribute.
  • C. hasBottleColor
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a bottle characterized by a specific color.
  • D. shapeTheme
    Indicates a relationship where one entity’s form, outline, or geometric characteristics serve as a central motif or organizing principle for another entity.
  • E. themeInspiration chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the creative source or conceptual basis that inspires or shapes the theme expressed in another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f07734c8190814e937e12257a78 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fc4748843c8190931432653be4890c completed May 7, 2026, 8:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fc45646ce481908caf292ff9f06e15 completed May 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.