Triple

T38114452
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bar suit E951751 entity
Predicate inFashionCanon P176376 FINISHED
Object key example of the New Look silhouette LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: key example of the New Look silhouette | Statement: [Bar suit, inFashionCanon, key example of the New Look silhouette]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inFashionCanon
Context triple: [Bar suit, inFashionCanon, key example of the New Look silhouette]
  • A. usesCanon
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on another entity as its standard, reference, or authoritative source.
  • B. canonType chosen
    Indicates the classification of something according to its status or role within an official or accepted canon.
  • C. inCanonWith
    Indicates that two or more works, events, or elements are officially recognized as belonging to the same narrative continuity or canon.
  • D. givesCanon
    Indicates that one entity provides or establishes an official or authoritative version (canon) of something for another entity or context.
  • E. viewOnCanon
    Indicates that one entity expresses or embodies a particular stance, interpretation, or judgment about what is considered canonical within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f07734c8190814e937e12257a78 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fc4748843c8190931432653be4890c completed May 7, 2026, 8:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fc45646ce481908caf292ff9f06e15 completed May 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.