Triple
T38114163
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jibbitz charms |
E951744
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLogoVariant |
P200983
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Crocs logo charms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crocs logo charms | Statement: [Jibbitz charms, hasLogoVariant, Crocs logo charms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLogoVariant Context triple: [Jibbitz charms, hasLogoVariant, Crocs logo charms]
-
A.
hasLogoStyle
Indicates that an entity’s logo possesses or is characterized by a particular visual style or design approach.
-
B.
hasLogoText
Indicates that an entity’s logo includes specific textual content or wording.
-
C.
hasLogoShape
Indicates that an entity’s logo is characterized by or takes the form of a specified geometric or visual shape.
-
D.
hasOfficialLogo
Indicates that one entity is the formally recognized logo or emblem representing another entity.
-
E.
hasFormerLogo
Indicates that an entity is associated with a logo it used in the past but no longer uses.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f07734c8190814e937e12257a78 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffbf84f4948190b41a7bba07ae61ec |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffbf0a59f88190870dbe25d8a63a00 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ffbf8402c48190a9bf3c3fcb874508 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.