Triple

T380968
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ada (programming language) E8676 entity
Predicate safety P12725 FINISHED
Object emphasized LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: emphasized | Statement: [Ada (programming language), safety, emphasized]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: safety
Context triple: [Ada (programming language), safety, emphasized]
  • A. security
    Indicates that an entity provides protection, safety measures, or safeguards to another entity or against specific threats or risks.
  • B. securityFeature
    Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
  • C. securityArrangementsBy
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
  • D. protects
    Indicates taking action to keep someone or something safe from harm, danger, or negative effects.
  • E. aimsToProtect
    Indicates an intention or purpose to safeguard or defend one entity, value, or condition from harm, risk, or undesirable outcomes.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7f47dd08190a4e294ccbbe46cd4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ec2c95088190a603bb1ee076ebd6 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e964d4b481909290e474b0341e3c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2eae0bd7081908197bbf5c55fe647 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.