Triple
T380966
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ada (programming language) |
E8676
|
entity |
| Predicate | memorySafety |
P2368
|
FINISHED |
| Object | emphasized |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: emphasized | Statement: [Ada (programming language), memorySafety, emphasized]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: memorySafety Context triple: [Ada (programming language), memorySafety, emphasized]
-
A.
securityAspect
Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
-
B.
securityMechanism
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a means or method to protect another entity from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
-
C.
securityFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
-
D.
securedVariant
Indicates that one entity is a security-enhanced or more protected version of another entity.
-
E.
consideredInsecureAtKeySize
Indicates that a cryptographic algorithm or mechanism is regarded as insecure when used with a specified key size.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f47dd08190a4e294ccbbe46cd4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec2c95088190a603bb1ee076ebd6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e964d4b481909290e474b0341e3c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.