Triple

T38084298
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ludwig der Springer E950932 entity
Predicate imprisonment P22460 FINISHED
Object subject of legendary tale LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject of legendary tale | Statement: [Ludwig der Springer, imprisonment, subject of legendary tale]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: imprisonment
Context triple: [Ludwig der Springer, imprisonment, subject of legendary tale]
  • A. imprisonedFor
    Indicates that one entity is held in detention or jail as a consequence of, or in connection with, a specific reason, action, or offense committed by another entity or itself.
  • B. imprisonmentContext chosen
    Indicates that one entity is held in confinement or custody by another entity or authority within a specific legal, temporal, or situational context.
  • C. imprisonedWith
    Indicates that two entities are confined or held in prison together at the same time and place.
  • D. sometimesImprisons
    Indicates that one entity occasionally confines or incarcerates another entity, but not on a regular or constant basis.
  • E. usedForImprisoning
    Indicates that something serves as a means, tool, or method for confining or detaining someone against their will.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f03a3608190a73fd6df87c792a8 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fc4748843c8190931432653be4890c completed May 7, 2026, 8:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fc45646ce481908caf292ff9f06e15 completed May 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.