Triple
T38083442
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Disabled Person’s Tax Credit |
E950913
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiredEvidence |
P17773
|
FINISHED |
| Object | proof of disability |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proof of disability | Statement: [Disabled Person’s Tax Credit, requiredEvidence, proof of disability]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiredEvidence Context triple: [Disabled Person’s Tax Credit, requiredEvidence, proof of disability]
-
A.
requiresProofOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity must provide formal evidence or documentation to validate or authorize another entity.
-
B.
requiredToProvide
Indicates that one entity has an obligation or duty to supply or furnish something to another entity.
-
C.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
D.
requiresProofIn
Indicates that one entity must be justified, validated, or supported by formal proof within the context or framework specified by another entity.
-
E.
presentsEvidenceTo
Indicates that one entity formally provides or shows evidence to another entity, typically to support a claim, argument, or decision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f03a3608190a73fd6df87c792a8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00af6b3a948190a92813c13384c304 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00aec35610819085dd5137715a4228 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.