Triple
T38076448
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marriage Act 1753 |
E950724
|
entity |
| Predicate | notApplicableInJurisdiction |
P189938
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Scotland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Scotland | Statement: [Marriage Act 1753, notApplicableInJurisdiction, Scotland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notApplicableInJurisdiction Context triple: [Marriage Act 1753, notApplicableInJurisdiction, Scotland]
-
A.
appliedInJurisdiction
Indicates that a rule, decision, or action is put into effect or holds legal force within a specified jurisdiction.
-
B.
existsInJurisdiction
Indicates that an entity is located within, falls under, or is subject to the authority of a particular legal or administrative jurisdiction.
-
C.
usesJurisdiction
Indicates that one entity applies or operates under the legal authority or rules of a particular jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasNoJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one entity lacks the legal authority or power to govern, regulate, or make binding decisions over another entity or matter.
-
E.
usedForJurisdiction
Indicates that something (such as a rule, document, or authority) is applied to define, govern, or determine the scope of a particular jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f02a6c48190a94f3c0b3ee90cf2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fc44c7e73c819082d4fc1900fb9632 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8efffbc8190a139798ad1880526 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fc44c67118819088accfeded7b449e |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.