Triple
T38053774
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Republic Act No. 6657 |
E949842
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAmendingLaw |
P30689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Republic Act No. 9700 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Republic Act No. 9700 | Statement: [Republic Act No. 6657, hasAmendingLaw, Republic Act No. 9700]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAmendingLaw Context triple: [Republic Act No. 6657, hasAmendingLaw, Republic Act No. 9700]
-
A.
hasAmendments
Indicates that one entity (such as a document, law, or agreement) includes or is associated with one or more modifications, changes, or additions made after its original creation.
-
B.
canAmendBills
Indicates that an entity has the authority or ability to modify, revise, or propose changes to bills.
-
C.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
D.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
-
E.
legalAmendment
chosen
Indicates a formal change or modification made to an existing law, regulation, or legal document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f000cf081908c11fb5443b392e6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fc44c7e73c819082d4fc1900fb9632 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8efffbc8190a139798ad1880526 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.