Triple

T38047372
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2006 Canadian federal election E949652 entity
Predicate thirdPartySeatCount P193979 FINISHED
Object 29 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 29 | Statement: [2006 Canadian federal election, thirdPartySeatCount, 29]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thirdPartySeatCount
Context triple: [2006 Canadian federal election, thirdPartySeatCount, 29]
  • A. thirdPartySeats
    Indicates that a third-party entity is allocated or occupies seats (e.g., in a venue, vehicle, or governing body) associated with another primary party or arrangement.
  • B. thirdPlaceSeatCount
    Indicates the number of seats allocated to the entity that finished in third place in a given ranking or competition.
  • C. seatCount
    Indicates the number of seats associated with an entity, such as a venue, vehicle, or room.
  • D. individualSeats
    Indicates that an entity provides or consists of separate, single-person seating positions rather than shared or bench-style seating.
  • E. secondPartySeats
    Indicates that a second party assigns or provides seating or seats to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f000cf081908c11fb5443b392e6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd5bf69acc819092a01e4259785dc3 completed May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd59b3f4ac8190a7f9dd3142da6e09 completed May 8, 2026, 3:34 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd5bf49288819098a12202411cba4f completed May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.