Triple
T38047369
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2006 Canadian federal election |
E949652
|
entity |
| Predicate | fourthPartyPopularVoteShare |
P157864
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 10.5% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 10.5% | Statement: [2006 Canadian federal election, fourthPartyPopularVoteShare, 10.5%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fourthPartyPopularVoteShare Context triple: [2006 Canadian federal election, fourthPartyPopularVoteShare, 10.5%]
-
A.
thirdPartyPopularVote
Indicates that the relationship concerns the share or count of votes received by candidates outside the two main parties in an election.
-
B.
fourthPlacePopularVoteShare
chosen
Indicates the proportion of total popular votes received by the candidate or option that finished in fourth place in an election or vote.
-
C.
popularVoteShareThird
Indicates the proportion of total popular votes received by the third-place candidate or option in an election.
-
D.
AlliancePopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by a political alliance in an election relative to all valid votes cast.
-
E.
secondPartyPopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total popular votes received by the second party in an election.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f000cf081908c11fb5443b392e6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fc44c7e73c819082d4fc1900fb9632 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8efffbc8190a139798ad1880526 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.