Triple

T380449
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject WHATWG E8665 entity
Predicate standardizationApproach P12712 FINISHED
Object living standard model LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: living standard model | Statement: [WHATWG, standardizationApproach, living standard model]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardizationApproach
Context triple: [WHATWG, standardizationApproach, living standard model]
  • A. standardizationStatus
    Indicates the current stage or condition of an entity in a formal standardization process (e.g., proposed, under review, approved, deprecated).
  • B. standardizationInfluence
    Indicates the extent to which one entity’s standards, norms, or standardization efforts shape, guide, or constrain another entity’s practices, processes, or specifications.
  • C. standardizedIn
    Indicates that something has been formally defined, regulated, or made uniform within a particular standard, framework, or jurisdiction.
  • D. standardizedBy
    Indicates that one entity defines, regulates, or formalizes the standards or specifications by which another entity is created, measured, or operated.
  • E. standardizedFor
    Indicates that something has been adjusted or converted to conform to a common standard, format, or reference so it can be consistently compared or used.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7f47dd08190a4e294ccbbe46cd4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ec2c95088190a603bb1ee076ebd6 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e964d4b481909290e474b0341e3c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2eae0bd7081908197bbf5c55fe647 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:17 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.