Triple
T38040739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kripkenstein interpretation |
E949473
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | position in philosophy of language |
C65592
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: position in philosophy of language Context triple: [Kripkenstein interpretation, instanceOf, position in philosophy of language]
-
A.
example in philosophy of language
An example in philosophy of language is a specific, often simplified case or scenario used to illustrate, test, or clarify a theoretical claim about meaning, reference, or linguistic practice.
-
B.
theory of sense and reference
The theory of sense and reference is a philosophical framework, originating with Frege, that distinguishes between the meaning or mode of presentation of an expression (sense) and the actual object or truth-value it stands for (reference) to explain how language conveys information and supports rational thought.
-
C.
linguistic philosopher
A linguistic philosopher is a thinker who analyzes how language shapes meaning, thought, and reality, often examining the structure, use, and limits of linguistic expressions to clarify philosophical problems.
-
D.
position in philosophy of action
A position in philosophy of action is a theoretical stance that explains what actions are, how they differ from mere events, and how they relate to agents’ intentions, reasons, and responsibility.
-
E.
theory of predication
The theory of predication is a philosophical account of how properties, relations, or attributes are meaningfully ascribed to subjects in propositions, explaining the structure and truth-conditions of statements like “S is P.”
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eff0bb0819084bc4e63997bd039 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.