Triple
T38034845
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New York State |
E949320
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEvidenceCode |
P189886
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New York rules of evidence (case law–based) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York rules of evidence (case law–based) | Statement: [New York State, hasEvidenceCode, New York rules of evidence (case law–based)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEvidenceCode Context triple: [New York State, hasEvidenceCode, New York rules of evidence (case law–based)]
-
A.
hasEvidenceItem
Indicates that there exists a specific piece of evidence supporting, illustrating, or justifying the associated entity or claim.
-
B.
hasMaterialEvidence
Indicates that there exists tangible, physical evidence supporting or associated with a particular entity, event, or claim.
-
C.
hasProcessEvidence
Indicates that there is supporting evidence for a process or procedure associated with the subject in relation to the object.
-
D.
hasNoEvidenceOf
Indicates that there is no supporting proof, data, or documentation confirming the existence or occurrence of the referenced condition, event, or relationship.
-
E.
presentsEvidenceTo
Indicates that one entity formally provides or shows evidence to another entity, typically to support a claim, argument, or decision.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eff0bb0819084bc4e63997bd039 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fc44c7e73c819082d4fc1900fb9632 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8efffbc8190a139798ad1880526 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fc44c67118819088accfeded7b449e |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.