Triple

T38034844
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York State E949320 entity
Predicate hasCriminalProcedureCode P107869 FINISHED
Object New York Criminal Procedure Law NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York Criminal Procedure Law | Statement: [New York State, hasCriminalProcedureCode, New York Criminal Procedure Law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCriminalProcedureCode
Context triple: [New York State, hasCriminalProcedureCode, New York Criminal Procedure Law]
  • A. hasCriminalProcedureBasedOn
    Indicates that one legal system’s criminal procedure is derived from, modeled on, or fundamentally influenced by another specified source or framework.
  • B. hasCriminalCodeForm chosen
    Indicates that something is associated with, represented by, or expressed in a particular criminal code form or format.
  • C. haveCriminalLaw
    Indicates that an entity possesses, applies, or is governed by a system or body of criminal law.
  • D. hasCriminalJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one authority or legal body holds the power to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate criminal offenses committed within a specified scope or territory in relation to another entity.
  • E. hasCriminalLawPrinciple
    Indicates that there exists a criminal law doctrine, rule, or principle that applies to, governs, or characterizes the referenced entity or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eff0bb0819084bc4e63997bd039 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd7b0503a08190ba07338365b6fcc9 completed May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd7a9733dc81909199f453c0cc2bc1 completed May 8, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.