Triple
T38034831
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New York State |
E949320
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCriminalTrialCourt |
P35121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New York City Criminal Court |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York City Criminal Court | Statement: [New York State, hasCriminalTrialCourt, New York City Criminal Court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCriminalTrialCourt Context triple: [New York State, hasCriminalTrialCourt, New York City Criminal Court]
-
A.
hasCriminalProcedureBasedOn
Indicates that one legal system’s criminal procedure is derived from, modeled on, or fundamentally influenced by another specified source or framework.
-
B.
haveCriminalLaw
Indicates that an entity possesses, applies, or is governed by a system or body of criminal law.
-
C.
hasTribunal
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or subject to a specific tribunal, such as a court or adjudicative body, that has authority over its cases or matters.
-
D.
hasTrialCourtLevel
Indicates the specific level or tier within the judicial hierarchy at which a trial court operates.
-
E.
hasCriminalJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or legal body holds the power to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate criminal offenses committed within a specified scope or territory in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eff0bb0819084bc4e63997bd039 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd783fed9c81909e792702636c4f1f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7788e63c81909de22fdafcfe41c0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.