Triple
T3801986
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oghuz Uzbek |
E91708
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEthnicHeritageIn |
P1969
|
FINISHED |
| Object | modern Uzbeks |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: modern Uzbeks | Statement: [Oghuz Uzbek, hasEthnicHeritageIn, modern Uzbeks]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEthnicHeritageIn Context triple: [Oghuz Uzbek, hasEthnicHeritageIn, modern Uzbeks]
-
A.
ethnicOrigin
Indicates the relationship where an entity is associated with a particular ethnic group or ancestry.
-
B.
hasEthnicInfluence
Indicates that one entity has a cultural, traditional, or ethnic impact on, or contributes to shaping the ethnic character of, another entity.
-
C.
hasEthnicCharacteristic
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular ethnic characteristic or identity.
-
D.
relatedEthnicGroup
chosen
Indicates that there is a notable ethnic connection or association between two ethnic groups, such as shared ancestry, culture, or historical ties.
-
E.
containedEthnicGroup
Indicates that one entity (typically a larger group, region, or population) includes or encompasses a particular ethnic group within it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed96354f48190a768966d6bd19b04 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aee8db8a288190afd1e3b9dcf02e97 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee7461abc8190945716f4b93e1a18 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:15 p.m.