Triple

T38009926
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Richard Carstone E948336 entity
Predicate financialEffectOf P167518 FINISHED
Object Jarndyce and Jarndyce lawsuit LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jarndyce and Jarndyce lawsuit | Statement: [Richard Carstone, financialEffectOf, Jarndyce and Jarndyce lawsuit]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: financialEffectOf
Context triple: [Richard Carstone, financialEffectOf, Jarndyce and Jarndyce lawsuit]
  • A. budgetaryEffect
    Indicates the financial impact or change in budget resulting from a particular action, decision, or policy.
  • B. costImpact
    Indicates the effect that one entity or action has on the cost associated with another entity or process.
  • C. economicAspect
    Indicates that something is related to, characterized by, or has implications for economic factors, conditions, or outcomes.
  • D. impactOnEconomy
    Indicates the effect or influence that one factor, event, or action has on the state or performance of an economy.
  • E. hasEconomicImplication chosen
    Indicates that one entity’s state, action, or relationship has a direct or indirect impact on the economic conditions, costs, or financial outcomes of another entity or system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76efb4b10819092c8c2ba28ac06a8 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbc995dc2481908b3bd4217f8101e7 completed May 6, 2026, 11:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbc8ee04f08190977b7ad70fc85896 completed May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.