Triple

T37969279
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prince-Bishop of Regensburg E947233 entity
Predicate heldJudicialAuthority P32953 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Prince-Bishop of Regensburg, heldJudicialAuthority, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heldJudicialAuthority
Context triple: [Prince-Bishop of Regensburg, heldJudicialAuthority, yes]
  • A. heldJudicialPositionIn
    Indicates that an entity served in an official judicial role or office within a specified jurisdiction or court.
  • B. hadJudicialFunction chosen
    Indicates that an entity exercised or was assigned an official judicial role, authority, or responsibility in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasPrincipalJudge
    Indicates that one entity serves as the main or presiding judge for another entity, such as a court or judicial body.
  • D. heldCourtUnder
    Indicates that one authority conducted judicial or ceremonial court proceedings under the jurisdiction, auspices, or authority of another.
  • E. hasJudiciary
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ef7db908190bba6086673a32300 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbc7b78f9481909f4f8fc2e3fdcde1 completed May 6, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbbd18c9908190928d274f8731dfa8 completed May 6, 2026, 10:13 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.