Triple

T3796707
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1999 Stanley Cup Finals E91586 entity
Predicate clinchingGoalControversy P51806 FINISHED
Object skate in the crease rule LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: skate in the crease rule | Statement: [1999 Stanley Cup Finals, clinchingGoalControversy, skate in the crease rule]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clinchingGoalControversy
Context triple: [1999 Stanley Cup Finals, clinchingGoalControversy, skate in the crease rule]
  • A. goldenGoalRuleUsed
    Indicates that the outcome of a match or competition was determined using the golden goal rule, where the first score in extra time immediately ends the game.
  • B. ownGoalBy
    Indicates that a goal was accidentally scored against a team by the specified player (i.e., the player scored an own goal).
  • C. scoredGameWinningGoal
    Indicates that an entity scored the decisive goal that determined the final victory in a game.
  • D. penaltyShootoutOccurred
    Indicates that a penalty shootout took place to decide the outcome of a match or contest.
  • E. penaltyShootoutWinner
    Indicates that one competitor or team is the winner of a match decided by a penalty shootout.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed96354f48190a768966d6bd19b04 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeecefa3608190a7a20ed6df6a64b2 completed March 9, 2026, 3:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee743c8d08190a9f9c97b836bd703 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69aeecee63e8819099b8ee8ad4d4354e completed March 9, 2026, 3:53 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:15 p.m.