Triple

T37958145
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Le Pont-de-Montvert E946922 entity
Predicate administrativeStatusBefore2016 P95739 FINISHED
Object independent commune LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: independent commune | Statement: [Le Pont-de-Montvert, administrativeStatusBefore2016, independent commune]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: administrativeStatusBefore2016
Context triple: [Le Pont-de-Montvert, administrativeStatusBefore2016, independent commune]
  • A. administrativeStatusBefore1986
    Indicates the administrative status or classification that an entity held prior to the year 1986.
  • B. statusBefore2016 chosen
    Indicates the status or condition that an entity had prior to the year 2016.
  • C. formerAdministrativeStatus
    Indicates that an entity previously held, but no longer holds, a particular administrative status or role.
  • D. statusBefore2022
    Indicates that an entity’s status or condition is defined as it existed prior to the year 2022.
  • E. hasAdministrativeStatusSince
    Indicates that an entity has held a particular administrative status continuously from a specified point in time onward.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ef7062c819091bfacb7e83aa1e0 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe91383a1c81909266e40c3c3ede6c completed May 9, 2026, 1:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe8fde094081908f0f121664fbb5c7 completed May 9, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.