Triple
T37946317
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bartolomé de Medina |
E946613
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrineDescribed |
P91768
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lawfulness of following a probable opinion in morals |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lawfulness of following a probable opinion in morals | Statement: [Bartolomé de Medina, doctrineDescribed, lawfulness of following a probable opinion in morals]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrineDescribed Context triple: [Bartolomé de Medina, doctrineDescribed, lawfulness of following a probable opinion in morals]
-
A.
doctrineRefined
Indicates that an existing doctrine has been further developed, clarified, or improved in its formulation or application.
-
B.
doctrineExplainedBy
Indicates that an explanation or interpretation is provided for a particular doctrine by a specified source or agent.
-
C.
doctrineDiscussed
chosen
Indicates that a particular doctrine is the topic of discussion or analysis in a given context or interaction.
-
D.
doctrineFormulatedIn
Indicates that a particular doctrine was created, articulated, or formally established during a specific time or at a specific place.
-
E.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ef531ac8190ae6d99e5786e76ec |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbc995dc2481908b3bd4217f8101e7 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8ee04f08190977b7ad70fc85896 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.