Triple
T37909162
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Letters to Lord Mansfield |
E945637
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCaseCritiqued |
P78583
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Douglas Cause |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Douglas Cause | Statement: [Letters to Lord Mansfield, legalCaseCritiqued, Douglas Cause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseCritiqued Context triple: [Letters to Lord Mansfield, legalCaseCritiqued, Douglas Cause]
-
A.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
B.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
C.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
D.
legalCaseRelatedTo
chosen
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
-
E.
legalDoctrineConfirmed
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine has been formally upheld, validated, or reaffirmed by an authoritative legal decision or body.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ef20bb0819088b5b6ceecb0b8fc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a001540d4f881908a4688881875e774 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0014a8cdd88190a67a90a2df2c5e18 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:20 p.m.