Triple

T37888226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sally Seton E945055 entity
Predicate youthfulLoveInterestOf P152714 FINISHED
Object Clarissa Dalloway NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Clarissa Dalloway | Statement: [Sally Seton, youthfulLoveInterestOf, Clarissa Dalloway]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: youthfulLoveInterestOf
Context triple: [Sally Seton, youthfulLoveInterestOf, Clarissa Dalloway]
  • A. formerRomanticInterest
    Indicates that one entity previously had a romantic relationship or attraction toward another entity, but that romantic connection has since ended.
  • B. isChildhoodSweetheartOf chosen
    Indicates that two people were romantically involved with each other during their childhood or adolescence, typically as first or early sweethearts.
  • C. loveInterestPortrayedBy
    Indicates that a character’s romantic interest is depicted or played by a particular actor or performer.
  • D. hasYoungLoverCharacter
    Indicates that an entity is involved in a romantic or intimate relationship with a significantly younger lover character.
  • E. hasRomanticTensionWith
    Indicates a mutual or one-sided romantic attraction or unresolved romantic interest existing between two entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ef02668819089e7940c4001af5e completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbc36ce1f88190a7fa1656b714e107 completed May 6, 2026, 10:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbbd166a488190b1bf9316b0790801 completed May 6, 2026, 10:13 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.