Triple

T37888185
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Peter Walsh E945054 entity
Predicate hasEnduringAttachmentTo P196532 FINISHED
Object Clarissa Dalloway NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Clarissa Dalloway | Statement: [Peter Walsh, hasEnduringAttachmentTo, Clarissa Dalloway]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEnduringAttachmentTo
Context triple: [Peter Walsh, hasEnduringAttachmentTo, Clarissa Dalloway]
  • A. hasAttachmentOrgan
    Indicates that one entity possesses a specific anatomical or structural organ used to attach, anchor, or fasten it to another entity or substrate.
  • B. hasDetachment
    Indicates that an entity is separated, disconnected, or removed from another entity or its original position.
  • C. supportsAttachments
    Indicates that the subject is capable of handling or allowing the inclusion of file or data attachments in its operation or context.
  • D. permanentlyAttachedSince
    Indicates that one entity has been fixed or joined to another in a way intended to be lasting, starting from a specific point in time.
  • E. attachedTo
    Indicates that one entity is physically or logically fastened, connected, or joined to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ef02668819089e7940c4001af5e completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe59d11e9881909d2f33b7c717030e completed May 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe394fdfbc8190a931926ae3635cbf completed May 8, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe59d03a648190bbe846cb5730a477 completed May 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.