Triple
T37880068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | kenzan (needlepoint holders) |
E944841
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeAttachedWith |
P142693
|
FINISHED |
| Object | florist’s clay |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: florist’s clay | Statement: [kenzan (needlepoint holders), canBeAttachedWith, florist’s clay]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeAttachedWith Context triple: [kenzan (needlepoint holders), canBeAttachedWith, florist’s clay]
-
A.
canBeAddedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
-
B.
canBeLinkedTo
Indicates that one entity has the potential or capability to be connected or associated with another entity.
-
C.
canBeAdaptedBy
Indicates that one entity is capable of being modified, adjusted, or tailored for use by another entity.
-
D.
canBeAugmentedWith
Indicates that one entity is capable of being enhanced, expanded, or supplemented by another entity.
-
E.
mayBeIntegratedWith
Indicates that one entity has the potential or capability to be combined or incorporated with another entity into a unified or interoperable whole.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ef02668819089e7940c4001af5e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff956dc6548190979171d4b4068d47 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff93dc39c481908a97a12c3ef7dfe7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.