Triple

T37867632
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Río Darro E944517 entity
Predicate tambiénLlamadoHistóricamente P145623 FINISHED
Object río de la Plata NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: río de la Plata | Statement: [Río Darro, tambiénLlamadoHistóricamente, río de la Plata]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tambiénLlamadoHistóricamente
Context triple: [Río Darro, tambiénLlamadoHistóricamente, río de la Plata]
  • A. historicalNameUsedIn chosen
    Indicates that a historical or former name was used to refer to a particular entity in some context.
  • B. historicallyRecognizedAs
    Indicates that an entity has been acknowledged or designated under a particular name, status, or role during a past historical period.
  • C. historicallyBorneBy
    Indicates that an entity has carried, possessed, or used another entity (such as a name, title, or symbol) at some point in the past.
  • D. historicallyLinked
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a shared or related historical event, period, or development.
  • E. historicalNameInSpanish
    Indicates that an entity is known or referred to by a particular historical name when expressed in the Spanish language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eee2f9c8190b1272aa2ee55ebf5 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbbae559a8819086ef839973f8d9b2 completed May 6, 2026, 10:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbb1440fa08190abf25ba684f75b6e completed May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.