Triple

T37851331
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Allan Carpenter E944062 entity
Predicate hasFictionalTimeTravel P60994 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Allan Carpenter, hasFictionalTimeTravel, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalTimeTravel
Context triple: [Allan Carpenter, hasFictionalTimeTravel, yes]
  • A. hasFictionalTimeAfter
    Indicates that one fictional time point or period occurs later than another within a narrative or imagined timeline.
  • B. fictionalTime chosen
    Indicates that the associated time or temporal reference exists only within a fictional or imagined context, rather than in real-world chronology.
  • C. usesTimeTravelFor
    Indicates a relationship where an entity employs time travel as a means or method to achieve, affect, or interact with another entity or objective.
  • D. existsInFictionalTimePeriod
    Indicates that an entity is situated within, or associated with, a time period that is fictional rather than part of real-world history.
  • E. hasTemporalParadox
    Indicates that a situation, event, or sequence of events involves a contradiction or inconsistency in time, such as conflicting timelines or causality loops.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eed4d9c81908b1b71ba9e3b61fe completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a00776c4ebc8190899005fda34234d5 completed May 10, 2026, 12:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0076f8a4c4819093ed577e67aa38f9 completed May 10, 2026, 12:15 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.