Triple

T37841071
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rosser’s trick in incompleteness proofs E943475 entity
Predicate instanceOf P0 FINISHED
Object refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness argument C28854 CONCEPT FINISHED

How this triple was built (1 step)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

CD Concept disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness argument
Context triple: [Rosser’s trick in incompleteness proofs, instanceOf, refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness argument]
  • A. construction in proof theory chosen
    A construction in proof theory is a systematically defined method or procedure used within formal proofs to build objects, derive new statements, or transform existing proofs while preserving logical validity.
  • B. result in proof theory
    In proof theory, a result is a formally derived conclusion or theorem obtained from a given set of axioms and inference rules within a logical system.
  • C. Hilbert's tenth problem
    Hilbert's tenth problem asks for a general algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary Diophantine equation (a polynomial equation with integer coefficients) has an integer solution, a task later proven to be undecidable.
  • D. equivalence classes under Turing reducibility
    Equivalence classes under Turing reducibility are sets of decision problems (or sets of natural numbers) where each member can compute every other via a Turing reduction, grouping problems by their mutual computational power.
  • E. constructivist philosophy of mathematics
    Constructivist philosophy of mathematics is the view that mathematical objects exist only through explicit mental or formal constructions, so a statement is true only if we can construct a proof or example of it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (1 batch)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eeb0f7081908d6d3adbc469889c completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.