Triple
T37841071
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rosser’s trick in incompleteness proofs |
E943475
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness argument |
C28854
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness argument Context triple: [Rosser’s trick in incompleteness proofs, instanceOf, refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness argument]
-
A.
construction in proof theory
chosen
A construction in proof theory is a systematically defined method or procedure used within formal proofs to build objects, derive new statements, or transform existing proofs while preserving logical validity.
-
B.
result in proof theory
In proof theory, a result is a formally derived conclusion or theorem obtained from a given set of axioms and inference rules within a logical system.
-
C.
Hilbert's tenth problem
Hilbert's tenth problem asks for a general algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary Diophantine equation (a polynomial equation with integer coefficients) has an integer solution, a task later proven to be undecidable.
-
D.
equivalence classes under Turing reducibility
Equivalence classes under Turing reducibility are sets of decision problems (or sets of natural numbers) where each member can compute every other via a Turing reduction, grouping problems by their mutual computational power.
-
E.
constructivist philosophy of mathematics
Constructivist philosophy of mathematics is the view that mathematical objects exist only through explicit mental or formal constructions, so a statement is true only if we can construct a proof or example of it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eeb0f7081908d6d3adbc469889c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.