Triple
T37840887
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rosser trick |
E943471
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness proof |
C28854
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness proof Context triple: [Rosser trick, instanceOf, refinement of Gödel’s incompleteness proof]
-
A.
construction in proof theory
chosen
A construction in proof theory is a systematically defined method or procedure used within formal proofs to build objects, derive new statements, or transform existing proofs while preserving logical validity.
-
B.
result in proof theory
In proof theory, a result is a formally derived conclusion or theorem obtained from a given set of axioms and inference rules within a logical system.
-
C.
Hilbert's tenth problem
Hilbert's tenth problem asks for a general algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary Diophantine equation (a polynomial equation with integer coefficients) has an integer solution, a task later proven to be undecidable.
-
D.
framework in automated theorem proving
A framework in automated theorem proving is a structured environment of algorithms, data structures, and interfaces that coordinates the representation of logical formulas, the application of inference rules, and the management of proof search to automatically derive or verify theorems.
-
E.
interactive theorem prover
An interactive theorem prover is a software system that assists users in the formalization and step-by-step verification of mathematical proofs or program properties through human-guided logical reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eeb0f7081908d6d3adbc469889c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.