Triple
T37824758
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nossa Senhora da Conceição |
E943020
|
entity |
| Predicate | linkedDogmaDocument |
P198872
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ineffabilis Deus |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ineffabilis Deus | Statement: [Nossa Senhora da Conceição, linkedDogmaDocument, Ineffabilis Deus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedDogmaDocument Context triple: [Nossa Senhora da Conceição, linkedDogmaDocument, Ineffabilis Deus]
-
A.
relatedDogma
Indicates that one doctrine, belief, or dogma is conceptually or thematically connected to another.
-
B.
connectedDogmaProclaimedOn
Indicates that a particular dogma is formally linked to and proclaimed on a specific date or occasion.
-
C.
isDefinedAsDogmaBy
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or declares another entity as dogma or authoritative doctrine.
-
D.
sharesDogmaWith
Indicates that two entities hold and adhere to the same set of core beliefs, doctrines, or ideological principles.
-
E.
doctrinalDomain
Indicates the specific area of doctrine or body of teachings within which a belief, statement, or rule is classified.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eea4c8c8190a335aed5955cf2db |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff0e9c75208190a4423261f00b79b3 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff0e07f08481909c4ae322632a6bf0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff0e9b7acc81909a0ee66201a06877 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:38 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.