Triple
T37792741
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brownfields Amendments of 2002 |
E942126
|
entity |
| Predicate | grantsLiabilityProtectionTo |
P88097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | bona fide prospective purchasers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bona fide prospective purchasers | Statement: [Brownfields Amendments of 2002, grantsLiabilityProtectionTo, bona fide prospective purchasers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grantsLiabilityProtectionTo Context triple: [Brownfields Amendments of 2002, grantsLiabilityProtectionTo, bona fide prospective purchasers]
-
A.
protectedBy
Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
-
B.
legalProtectionFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides or is subject to legal safeguards, rights, or defenses in favor of another entity or interest.
-
C.
liabilityType
Indicates the specific category or nature of liability associated with an entity, obligation, or financial exposure.
-
D.
establishesLiabilityFor
Indicates that one party is held legally responsible or accountable for a particular act, omission, or outcome.
-
E.
protectedByAct
Indicates that something is safeguarded, regulated, or granted legal status under a specific legislative act or statute.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ee6f1f4819091e2cf9c9e6aee19 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd37b695c88190855801626f91c4cd |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd374cccf08190a230e87164af5938 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.